Belarus vs Kiribati: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Belarus
551,115 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
521,710 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
140th
Kiribati rank
141st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Belarus
  • Kiribati
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 551,115 constant LCU per square kilometre against 521,710 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 29,405 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 140th and Kiribati ranks 141st of 175 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 278,579 constant LCU per square kilometre 204,786 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,793 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 417,118 constant LCU per square kilometre 264,390 constant LCU per square kilometre 152,728 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 515,140 constant LCU per square kilometre 438,750 constant LCU per square kilometre 76,391 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Belarus or Kiribati?
Belarus, at 551,115 constant LCU per square kilometre against 521,710 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Belarus and Kiribati?
29,405 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Belarus ranks 140th and Kiribati ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.