Bahamas vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Bahamas
839,381 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
785,709 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
129th
New Zealand rank
130th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Zealand
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M197019962023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 839,381 constant LCU per square kilometre against 785,709 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 53,672 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 175 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 560,140 constant LCU per square kilometre 277,053 constant LCU per square kilometre 283,087 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 581,276 constant LCU per square kilometre 309,695 constant LCU per square kilometre 271,581 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 830,727 constant LCU per square kilometre 438,737 constant LCU per square kilometre 391,990 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 780,470 constant LCU per square kilometre 596,861 constant LCU per square kilometre 183,609 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 745,442 constant LCU per square kilometre 756,312 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,870 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Bahamas or New Zealand?
Bahamas, at 839,381 constant LCU per square kilometre against 785,709 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Bahamas and New Zealand?
53,672 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and New Zealand rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Bahamas ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/new-zealand/">Bahamas vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.