Congo vs Dominican Republic: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Congo
337,341 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Dominican Republic
317,566 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Congo rank
44th
Dominican Republic rank
47th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Congo
  • Dominican Republic
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196019922025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 337,341 constant LCU per person against 317,566 constant LCU per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 19,775 constant LCU per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 44th and Dominican Republic ranks 47th of 179 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 223,145 constant LCU per person 60,550 constant LCU per person 162,595 constant LCU per person Congo
1970s 188,416 constant LCU per person 86,355 constant LCU per person 102,062 constant LCU per person Congo
1980s 251,281 constant LCU per person 107,116 constant LCU per person 144,165 constant LCU per person Congo
1990s 234,454 constant LCU per person 125,614 constant LCU per person 108,840 constant LCU per person Congo
2000s 291,870 constant LCU per person 163,592 constant LCU per person 128,279 constant LCU per person Congo
2010s 322,925 constant LCU per person 238,491 constant LCU per person 84,434 constant LCU per person Congo
2020s 314,116 constant LCU per person 295,938 constant LCU per person 18,178 constant LCU per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Congo or Dominican Republic?
Congo, at 337,341 constant LCU per person against 317,566 constant LCU per person in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Congo and Dominican Republic?
19,775 constant LCU per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominican Republic?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Dominican Republic rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Congo ranks 44th and Dominican Republic ranks 47th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Dominican Republic: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/congo-rep/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/congo-rep/dominican-republic/">Congo vs Dominican Republic: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,445 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.