Bangladesh vs Philippines: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Bangladesh
132,673 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Philippines
144,329 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
65th
Philippines rank
62nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Philippines
50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k196019922025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 144,329 constant LCU per person against 132,673 constant LCU per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 11,656 constant LCU per person.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 65th and Philippines ranks 62nd of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 73,835 constant LCU per person 43,411 constant LCU per person 30,424 constant LCU per person Bangladesh
1970s 55,884 constant LCU per person 51,470 constant LCU per person 4,415 constant LCU per person Bangladesh
1980s 43,485 constant LCU per person 56,756 constant LCU per person 13,271 constant LCU per person Philippines
1990s 46,794 constant LCU per person 61,456 constant LCU per person 14,662 constant LCU per person Philippines
2000s 56,805 constant LCU per person 76,059 constant LCU per person 19,254 constant LCU per person Philippines
2010s 83,890 constant LCU per person 104,094 constant LCU per person 20,204 constant LCU per person Philippines
2020s 119,264 constant LCU per person 129,900 constant LCU per person 10,636 constant LCU per person Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Bangladesh or Philippines?
Philippines, at 144,329 constant LCU per person against 132,673 constant LCU per person in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Bangladesh and Philippines?
11,656 constant LCU per person, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Philippines?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Philippines rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Bangladesh ranks 65th and Philippines ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Philippines: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/bangladesh/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/bangladesh/philippines/">Bangladesh vs Philippines: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,445 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.