Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Guatemala
0.6373 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend
0.4346 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Guatemala rank
38th
Late-demographic dividend rank
35th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Late-demographic dividend
0246196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.6373 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4346 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.2027 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.5 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 38th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 35th of 172 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 1.58 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8794 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6984 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2000s 1.39 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.639 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 0.8742 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4361 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4381 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2020s 0.7166 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4259 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2906 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Guatemala or Late-demographic dividend?
Guatemala, at 0.6373 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4346 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend?
0.2027 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Guatemala ranks 38th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 35th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/late-demographic-dividend/">Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,939 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.