Ecuador vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Ecuador
0.5543 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.5446 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ecuador rank
69th
Rwanda rank
71st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Rwanda
0246196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.5543 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5446 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0097 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.

Ecuador ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 71st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4.72 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 5.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.464 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 3.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5705 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1980s 1.75 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.883 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8692 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1990s 1.72 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7044 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2000s 1.17 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0996 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2010s 0.6278 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7347 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1069 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.5877 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Ecuador or Rwanda?
Ecuador, at 0.5543 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5446 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Ecuador and Rwanda?
0.0097 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Ecuador ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 71st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/rwanda/">Ecuador vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,939 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.