Chile vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Chile
0.527 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
New Zealand
0.5156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
81st
New Zealand rank
84th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Chile
  • New Zealand
012345196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.527 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0114 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Chile ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 84th of 172 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 1.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.31 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1980s 1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2809 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1990s 0.872 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9878 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1157 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2000s 0.7917 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.827 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0353 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0.5614 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5446 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0168 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 0.5867 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.531 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0557 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Chile or New Zealand?
Chile, at 0.527 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Chile and New Zealand?
0.0114 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Chile ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 84th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-zealand/">Chile vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,939 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.