How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cyprus?

33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs Cyprus: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Cambodia

0.4804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Cyprus

0.484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Cambodia rank

101st

Cyprus rank

100th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

Cambodia
Cyprus

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0036 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 101st and Cyprus ranks 100th of 172 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	Cyprus	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.55 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7968 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7486 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2000s	1.28 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7125 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5701 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2010s	0.7612 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5961 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2020s	0.5441 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5364 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Cambodia or Cyprus?: Cyprus, at 0.484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Cambodia and Cyprus?: 0.0036 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cyprus?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Cambodia and Cyprus rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?: Cambodia ranks 101st and Cyprus ranks 100th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Cyprus: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/cyprus/">Cambodia vs Cyprus: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 214 places, 8,939 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 09 September 2026

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.