Angola vs Least developed countries: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Angola
1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Least developed countries
0.6191 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Angola rank
7th
Least developed countries rank
9th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Angola
  • Least developed countries
0.511.5199320092025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6191 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.4209 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.7 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 9th of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Least developed countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8482 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.16 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3082 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2010s 0.589 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7159 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1269 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2020s 0.9881 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.655 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.333 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Angola or Least developed countries?
Angola, at 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6191 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Angola and Least developed countries?
0.4209 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Least developed countries?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Angola and Least developed countries rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Angola ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 9th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Least developed countries: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Angola vs Least developed countries: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,939 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.