Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Rwanda
611.94 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
582.67 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Rwanda rank
160th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
162nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 611.94 constant 2015 US$ per person against 582.67 constant 2015 US$ per person in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 29.27 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Rwanda ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 162nd of 172 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 228.53 constant 2015 US$ per person 359.03 constant 2015 US$ per person 130.49 constant 2015 US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 342.19 constant 2015 US$ per person 456.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 114.49 constant 2015 US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 524.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 568.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 44.22 constant 2015 US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 565.95 constant 2015 US$ per person 579.62 constant 2015 US$ per person 13.68 constant 2015 US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Rwanda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Rwanda, at 611.94 constant 2015 US$ per person against 582.67 constant 2015 US$ per person in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
29.27 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Rwanda ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/rwanda/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/rwanda/tanzania/">Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,950 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.