Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Ecuador
3,950 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Africa
3,907 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
95th
South Africa rank
96th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3,950 constant 2015 US$ per person against 3,907 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Africa, a difference of 43 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 96th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1,973 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,075 constant 2015 US$ per person 102.65 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa
1970s 2,532 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,539 constant 2015 US$ per person 6.26 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa
1980s 3,094 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,600 constant 2015 US$ per person 494.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
1990s 3,169 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,538 constant 2015 US$ per person 630.74 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
2000s 2,953 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,261 constant 2015 US$ per person 307.81 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa
2010s 3,646 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,900 constant 2015 US$ per person 254.32 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa
2020s 3,782 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,817 constant 2015 US$ per person 34.87 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 3,950 constant 2015 US$ per person against 3,907 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Ecuador and South Africa?
43 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Ecuador ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 96th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,950 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.