Latvia vs Sweden: HICP - Total excluding housing (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Latvia
849.21
in 2026
Sweden
849.81
in 2026
Latvia rank
18th
Sweden rank
17th
HICP - Total excluding housing (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 849.81 against 849.21 in Latvia, a difference of 0.6.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 824.52 | 790.17 | 34.35 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 854.9 | 818.54 | 36.37 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 849.69 | 846.04 | 3.64 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 836.76 | 847.17 | 10.41 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - total excluding housing (neither seasonally nor working day), Latvia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 849.81 against 849.21 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - total excluding housing (neither seasonally nor working day) between Latvia and Sweden?
- 0.6, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for hicp - total excluding housing (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Latvia ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Total excluding housing (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.