Lithuania vs Sweden: HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Lithuania
2.14
in 2026
Sweden
2.57
in 2026
Lithuania rank
26th
Sweden rank
25th
HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2.57 against 2.14 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.43.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
Lithuania ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 25th of 27 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.83 | 6.07 | 4.23 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2.95 | 5.52 | 2.57 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2.48 | 4.97 | 2.49 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 2.21 | 4.17 | 1.96 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Lithuania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 2.57 against 2.14 in Lithuania as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 0.43, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Lithuania ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 25th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.