Latvia vs Sweden: HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Latvia
2.65
in 2026
Sweden
2.57
in 2026
Latvia rank
22nd
Sweden rank
25th
HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.65 against 2.57 in Sweden, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 25th of 27 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.69 | 6.07 | 3.38 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2.01 | 5.52 | 3.51 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2.84 | 4.97 | 2.13 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 2.59 | 4.17 | 1.59 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Latvia or Sweden?
- Latvia, at 2.65 against 2.57 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Latvia and Sweden?
- 0.08, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 25th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.