Latvia vs Netherlands: HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Latvia
2.65
in 2026
Netherlands
3.07
in 2026
Latvia rank
22nd
Netherlands rank
20th
HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 3.07 against 2.65 in Latvia, a difference of 0.42.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 20th of 27 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.69 | 4.49 | 1.81 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 2.01 | 3.7 | 1.69 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 2.84 | 3.92 | 1.07 | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 2.59 | 2.94 | 0.3486 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Latvia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 3.07 against 2.65 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 0.42, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for hicp - soft drinks (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 20th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Soft drinks (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.