Ireland vs Sweden: HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Ireland
16.22
in 2026
Sweden
18.47
in 2026
Ireland rank
25th
Sweden rank
23rd
HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Ireland
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 18.47 against 16.22 in Ireland, a difference of 2.25.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Sweden ahead.
Ireland ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 27 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.57 | 39.97 | 1.4 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 30.59 | 34.83 | 4.24 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 25.08 | 30.66 | 5.58 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 16.94 | 20.76 | 3.83 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Ireland or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 18.47 against 16.22 in Ireland as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Ireland and Sweden?
- 2.25, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sweden?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2026.
- How do Ireland and Sweden rank globally for hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Ireland ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.