Croatia vs Latvia: HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Croatia
29.92
in 2026
Latvia
28.85
in 2026
Croatia rank
8th
Latvia rank
9th
HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 29.92 against 28.85 in Latvia, a difference of 1.07.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.22 | 62.15 | 6.93 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 61.05 | 53.85 | 7.2 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 41.18 | 40.57 | 0.611 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 30.1 | 32.37 | 2.27 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 29.92 against 28.85 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Croatia and Latvia?
- 1.07, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Croatia ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.