Romania vs Sweden: HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Romania
4.98
in 2026
Sweden
4.37
in 2026
Romania rank
14th
Sweden rank
16th
HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Romania
- Sweden
How they compare
Romania currently reports 4.98 against 4.37 in Sweden, a difference of 0.61.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 27 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.99 | 4.02 | 19.96 | Romania |
| 2010s | 8.88 | 3.9 | 4.98 | Romania |
| 2020s | 5.38 | 4.1 | 1.28 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day), Romania or Sweden?
- Romania, at 4.98 against 4.37 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day) between Romania and Sweden?
- 0.61, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Romania and Sweden rank globally for hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Romania ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.