Malta vs Sweden: HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Malta
5.55
in 2026
Sweden
4.37
in 2026
Malta rank
13th
Sweden rank
16th
HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Malta
- Sweden
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.55 against 4.37 in Sweden, a difference of 1.18.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
Malta ranks 13th and Sweden ranks 16th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.02 | 5.57 | 0.5525 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 5.05 | 4.08 | 0.97 | Malta |
| 2010s | 4.38 | 3.9 | 0.485 | Malta |
| 2020s | 5.1 | 4.1 | 1 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day), Malta or Sweden?
- Malta, at 5.55 against 4.37 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day) between Malta and Sweden?
- 1.18, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Malta ranks 13th and Sweden ranks 16th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.