Malta vs Romania: HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Malta
5.55
in 2026
Romania
4.98
in 2026
Malta rank
13th
Romania rank
14th
HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Malta
- Romania
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.55 against 4.98 in Romania, a difference of 0.57.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Romania ahead.
Malta ranks 13th and Romania ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1 | 23.99 | 18.89 | Romania |
| 2010s | 4.38 | 8.88 | 4.5 | Romania |
| 2020s | 5.1 | 5.38 | 0.2729 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day), Malta or Romania?
- Malta, at 5.55 against 4.98 in Romania as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day) between Malta and Romania?
- 0.57, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Malta and Romania rank globally for hicp - oils and fats (nd) (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Malta ranks 13th and Romania ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Oils and fats (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.