Malta vs Poland: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Malta
29.82
in 2026
Poland
34.22
in 2026
Malta rank
17th
Poland rank
14th
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Malta
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 34.22 against 29.82 in Malta, a difference of 4.4.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 17th and Poland ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.62 | 99.52 | 60.9 | Poland |
| 2000s | 35.95 | 65.71 | 29.75 | Poland |
| 2010s | 33.28 | 46.17 | 12.89 | Poland |
| 2020s | 29.35 | 34.6 | 5.26 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Malta or Poland?
- Poland, at 34.22 against 29.82 in Malta as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Malta and Poland?
- 4.4, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Malta and Poland rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Malta ranks 17th and Poland ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.