Estonia vs Malta: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Estonia
33.32
in 2026
Malta
29.82
in 2026
Estonia rank
15th
Malta rank
17th
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Estonia
- Malta
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 33.32 against 29.82 in Malta, a difference of 3.5.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 15th and Malta ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.79 | 38.62 | 51.17 | Estonia |
| 2000s | 58.71 | 35.95 | 22.75 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 45.68 | 33.28 | 12.4 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 37.98 | 29.35 | 8.63 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Estonia or Malta?
- Estonia, at 33.32 against 29.82 in Malta as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Estonia and Malta?
- 3.5, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malta?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Estonia and Malta rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Estonia ranks 15th and Malta ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.