Czechia vs Latvia: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Czechia
41.04
in 2026
Latvia
44.74
in 2026
Czechia rank
6th
Latvia rank
4th
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 44.74 against 41.04 in Czechia, a difference of 3.7.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Czechia ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.55 | 68.67 | 21.12 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 42.56 | 51.69 | 9.13 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 46.11 | 46.49 | 0.3786 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Czechia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 44.74 against 41.04 in Czechia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Czechia and Latvia?
- 3.7, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2026.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Czechia ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.