Croatia vs Romania: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Croatia
49.16
in 2026
Romania
74.41
in 2026
Croatia rank
3rd
Romania rank
1st
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Croatia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 74.41 against 49.16 in Croatia, a difference of 25.25.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.5 times Croatia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.03 | 96.07 | 20.04 | Romania |
| 2010s | 52.17 | 86.99 | 34.82 | Romania |
| 2020s | 45.56 | 82.72 | 37.17 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Croatia or Romania?
- Romania, at 74.41 against 49.16 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Croatia and Romania?
- 25.25, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Romania rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Croatia ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.