Croatia vs Latvia: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Croatia
49.16
in 2026
Latvia
44.74
in 2026
Croatia rank
3rd
Latvia rank
4th
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 49.16 against 44.74 in Latvia, a difference of 4.42.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.25 | 94.59 | 12.34 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 75.97 | 68.67 | 7.29 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 52.17 | 51.69 | 0.486 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 45.56 | 46.49 | 0.9357 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 49.16 against 44.74 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Croatia and Latvia?
- 4.42, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Croatia ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.