Croatia vs Czechia: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Croatia
49.16
in 2026
Czechia
41.04
in 2026
Croatia rank
3rd
Czechia rank
6th
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Croatia
- Czechia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 49.16 against 41.04 in Czechia, a difference of 8.12.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 3rd and Czechia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.97 | 47.55 | 28.41 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 52.17 | 42.56 | 9.61 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 45.56 | 46.11 | 0.5571 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Croatia or Czechia?
- Croatia, at 49.16 against 41.04 in Czechia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Croatia and Czechia?
- 8.12, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Croatia ranks 3rd and Czechia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.