Austria vs Netherlands: HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land
Austria
22.39
in 2026
Netherlands
25.31
in 2026
Austria rank
25th
Netherlands rank
22nd
HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land over time
- Austria
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 25.31 against 22.39 in Austria, a difference of 2.92.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 25th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.41 | 36.06 | 2.35 | Austria |
| 2000s | 29.49 | 28.62 | 0.871 | Austria |
| 2010s | 23.68 | 27.05 | 3.37 | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 23.71 | 28.34 | 4.63 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land, Austria or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 25.31 against 22.39 in Austria as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land between Austria and Netherlands?
- 2.92, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Netherlands?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Austria and Netherlands rank globally for hicp - live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land?
- Austria ranks 25th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Live animals, and meat and other parts of slaughtered land animals (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.