Malta vs Romania: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Malta
8.6
in 2026
Romania
10.34
in 2026
Malta rank
8th
Romania rank
5th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Malta
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 10.34 against 8.6 in Malta, a difference of 1.74.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 8th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.51 | 10.27 | 0.7656 | Romania |
| 2010s | 9.58 | 9.41 | 0.17 | Malta |
| 2020s | 9.49 | 11.13 | 1.63 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Malta or Romania?
- Romania, at 10.34 against 8.6 in Malta as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Malta and Romania?
- 1.74, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Malta and Romania rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Malta ranks 8th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.