Latvia vs Romania: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Latvia
9.47
in 2026
Romania
10.34
in 2026
Latvia rank
6th
Romania rank
5th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 10.34 against 9.47 in Latvia, a difference of 0.87.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.99 | 10.27 | 2.72 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 10.8 | 9.41 | 1.38 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 9.74 | 11.13 | 1.38 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Latvia or Romania?
- Romania, at 10.34 against 9.47 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Latvia and Romania?
- 0.87, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.