Latvia vs Malta: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Latvia
9.47
in 2026
Malta
8.6
in 2026
Latvia rank
6th
Malta rank
8th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 9.47 against 8.6 in Malta, a difference of 0.87.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 6th and Malta ranks 8th of 27 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.61 | 10.67 | 7.94 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 13.07 | 9.47 | 3.6 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 10.8 | 9.58 | 1.21 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 9.74 | 9.49 | 0.2529 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Latvia or Malta?
- Latvia, at 9.47 against 8.6 in Malta as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Latvia and Malta?
- 0.87, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Malta ranks 8th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.