Italy vs Latvia: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Italy
12.09
in 2026
Latvia
9.47
in 2026
Italy rank
4th
Latvia rank
6th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 12.09 against 9.47 in Latvia, a difference of 2.62.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Italy ranks 4th and Latvia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.28 | 18.61 | 6.32 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 12.23 | 13.07 | 0.842 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 12.51 | 10.8 | 1.72 | Italy |
| 2020s | 13.53 | 9.74 | 3.79 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Italy or Latvia?
- Italy, at 12.09 against 9.47 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Italy and Latvia?
- 2.62, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Italy ranks 4th and Latvia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.