Croatia vs Romania: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Croatia
9.26
in 2026
Romania
10.34
in 2026
Croatia rank
7th
Romania rank
5th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Croatia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 10.34 against 9.26 in Croatia, a difference of 1.08.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 7th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8 | 10.27 | 5.53 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 9.92 | 9.41 | 0.508 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 8.69 | 11.13 | 2.43 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Croatia or Romania?
- Romania, at 10.34 against 9.26 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Croatia and Romania?
- 1.08, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Romania rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Croatia ranks 7th and Romania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.