Croatia vs Latvia: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Croatia
9.26
in 2026
Latvia
9.47
in 2026
Croatia rank
7th
Latvia rank
6th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 9.47 against 9.26 in Croatia, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.45 | 17.75 | 4.3 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 15.71 | 13.07 | 2.64 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 9.92 | 10.8 | 0.875 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 8.69 | 9.74 | 1.05 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 9.47 against 9.26 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0.21, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Croatia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.