Croatia vs Estonia: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Croatia
9.26
in 2026
Estonia
7.87
in 2026
Croatia rank
7th
Estonia rank
10th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 9.26 against 7.87 in Estonia, a difference of 1.39.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Estonia ahead.
Croatia ranks 7th and Estonia ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.45 | 13.14 | 0.3 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 15.71 | 9.97 | 5.75 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 9.92 | 9.62 | 0.306 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 8.69 | 9.23 | 0.5343 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Croatia or Estonia?
- Croatia, at 9.26 against 7.87 in Estonia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Croatia and Estonia?
- 1.39, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Croatia ranks 7th and Estonia ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.