Belgium vs Sweden: HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working)
Belgium
7.67
in 2026
Sweden
7.07
in 2026
Belgium rank
12th
Sweden rank
14th
HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 7.67 against 7.07 in Sweden, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.5 | 9.43 | 4.07 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 9.96 | 8.06 | 1.9 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 9.59 | 7.98 | 1.61 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 8.86 | 7.54 | 1.32 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working), Belgium or Sweden?
- Belgium, at 7.67 against 7.07 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working) between Belgium and Sweden?
- 0.6, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for hicp - fish and other seafood (nd) (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Belgium ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Fish and other seafood (ND) (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.