Czechia vs Latvia: HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index)
Czechia
129.1
in 2026
Latvia
133.74
in 2026
Czechia rank
2nd
Latvia rank
1st
HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index) over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 133.74 against 129.1 in Czechia, a difference of 4.64.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Czechia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 138.41 | 124.13 | 14.28 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 136.13 | 148.17 | 12.04 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 127.16 | 157.85 | 30.69 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index), Czechia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 133.74 against 129.1 in Czechia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index) between Czechia and Latvia?
- 4.64, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2026.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index)?
- Czechia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.