Croatia vs Estonia: HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index)
Croatia
121.94
in 2026
Estonia
125.8
in 2026
Croatia rank
5th
Estonia rank
3rd
HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index) over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 125.8 against 121.94 in Croatia, a difference of 3.86.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Estonia ahead.
Croatia ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 114.89 | 135.11 | 20.22 | Estonia |
| 2000s | 121.11 | 129.55 | 8.44 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 133.26 | 130.37 | 2.88 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 126.29 | 136.52 | 10.23 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index), Croatia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 125.8 against 121.94 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index) between Croatia and Estonia?
- 3.86, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index)?
- Croatia ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.