Belgium vs Sweden: HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index)
Belgium
80.4
in 2026
Sweden
79.02
in 2026
Belgium rank
20th
Sweden rank
22nd
HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index) over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 80.4 against 79.02 in Sweden, a difference of 1.38.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
Belgium ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106.26 | 121.31 | 15.05 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 104.74 | 117.55 | 12.81 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 105.11 | 101.61 | 3.5 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 102.94 | 87.56 | 15.38 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index), Belgium or Sweden?
- Belgium, at 80.4 against 79.02 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index) between Belgium and Sweden?
- 1.38, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for hicp - energy (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, sub-index)?
- Belgium ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Energy (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.