Croatia vs Romania: HICP - Energy and unprocessed food (Neither seasonally nor working)
Croatia
197.87
in 2026
Romania
228.54
in 2026
Croatia rank
2nd
Romania rank
1st
HICP - Energy and unprocessed food (Neither seasonally nor working) over time
- Croatia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 228.54 against 197.87 in Croatia, a difference of 30.67.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 259.92 | 349.51 | 89.59 | Romania |
| 2010s | 227.4 | 280.61 | 53.22 | Romania |
| 2020s | 199.35 | 236.17 | 36.82 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - energy and unprocessed food (neither seasonally nor working), Croatia or Romania?
- Romania, at 228.54 against 197.87 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - energy and unprocessed food (neither seasonally nor working) between Croatia and Romania?
- 30.67, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Romania rank globally for hicp - energy and unprocessed food (neither seasonally nor working)?
- Croatia ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Energy and unprocessed food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.