Croatia vs Latvia: HICP - Energy and seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Croatia
151.86
in 2026
Latvia
162.59
in 2026
Croatia rank
5th
Latvia rank
2nd
HICP - Energy and seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 162.59 against 151.86 in Croatia, a difference of 10.73.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 170.11 | 210.56 | 40.45 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 182.16 | 177.98 | 4.18 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 174.43 | 188.74 | 14.3 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 156.39 | 190.22 | 33.82 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - energy and seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day), Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 162.59 against 151.86 in Croatia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - energy and seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day) between Croatia and Latvia?
- 10.73, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - energy and seasonal food (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Croatia ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Energy and seasonal food (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.