Latvia vs Sweden: HICP - Clothing (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)
Latvia
45.08
in 2026
Sweden
43.25
in 2026
Latvia rank
9th
Sweden rank
12th
HICP - Clothing (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 45.08 against 43.25 in Sweden, a difference of 1.83.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
Latvia ranks 9th and Sweden ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.64 | 59.25 | 15.61 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 46.26 | 58.91 | 12.66 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 39.74 | 53.82 | 14.08 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 41.54 | 42.14 | 0.5971 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - clothing (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted), Latvia or Sweden?
- Latvia, at 45.08 against 43.25 in Sweden as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - clothing (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted) between Latvia and Sweden?
- 1.83, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2026.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for hicp - clothing (neither seasonally nor working day adjusted)?
- Latvia ranks 9th and Sweden ranks 12th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Clothing (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.