Croatia vs Latvia: HICP - Clothing and footwear (Neither seasonally nor working day)
Croatia
55.95
in 2026
Latvia
55.41
in 2026
Croatia rank
9th
Latvia rank
10th
HICP - Clothing and footwear (Neither seasonally nor working day) over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 55.95 against 55.41 in Latvia, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.69 | 64.3 | 8.39 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 77.2 | 68.58 | 8.63 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 52.58 | 55.43 | 2.85 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 48.91 | 53.61 | 4.7 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - clothing and footwear (neither seasonally nor working day), Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 55.95 against 55.41 in Latvia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in hicp - clothing and footwear (neither seasonally nor working day) between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0.54, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2026.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for hicp - clothing and footwear (neither seasonally nor working day)?
- Croatia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Clothing and footwear (Neither seasonally nor working day adjusted, Sub-index weight). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.