Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)

Poland
911.54 billion current US$
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2.06 trillion current US$
in 2025
Poland rank
20th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
22nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time

  • Poland
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T198120032025

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 2.06 trillion current US$ against 911.54 billion current US$ in Poland, a difference of 1.15 trillion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 2.3 times Poland's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 22nd of 205 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 142.90 billion current US$ 496.91 billion current US$ 354.01 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2000s 272.73 billion current US$ 747.97 billion current US$ 475.24 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 462.57 billion current US$ 1.64 trillion current US$ 1.18 trillion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2020s 702.98 billion current US$ 1.98 trillion current US$ 1.28 trillion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Poland or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 2.06 trillion current US$ against 911.54 billion current US$ in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
1.15 trillion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
Poland ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 22nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us/poland/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us/poland/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,967 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.