Lebanon vs Liechtenstein: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Lebanon
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 10.23 billion current US$ against 7.97 billion current US$ in Liechtenstein, a difference of 2.27 billion current US$.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Liechtenstein's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 151st and Liechtenstein ranks 154th of 204 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.48 billion current US$ | 6.22 billion current US$ | 41.27 billion current US$ | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 20.51 billion current US$ | 7.23 billion current US$ | 13.28 billion current US$ | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Lebanon or Liechtenstein?
- Lebanon, at 10.23 billion current US$ against 7.97 billion current US$ in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Lebanon and Liechtenstein?
- 2.27 billion current US$, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Liechtenstein?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Liechtenstein rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Lebanon ranks 151st and Liechtenstein ranks 154th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.