Egypt vs Kosovo: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Egypt
- Kosovo
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 350.36 billion current US$ against 9.78 billion current US$ in Kosovo, a difference of 340.58 billion current US$.
That makes Egypt's figure about 35.8 times Kosovo's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 43rd and Kosovo ranks 40th of 204 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 167.96 billion current US$ | 4.26 billion current US$ | 163.70 billion current US$ | Egypt |
| 2010s | 280.77 billion current US$ | 5.49 billion current US$ | 275.28 billion current US$ | Egypt |
| 2020s | 386.80 billion current US$ | 8.08 billion current US$ | 378.73 billion current US$ | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Egypt or Kosovo?
- Egypt, at 350.36 billion current US$ against 9.78 billion current US$ in Kosovo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Egypt and Kosovo?
- 340.58 billion current US$, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kosovo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Kosovo rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Egypt ranks 43rd and Kosovo ranks 40th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.