Bhutan vs Greenland: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Bhutan
- Greenland
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 3.26 billion current US$ against 3.19 billion current US$ in Greenland, a difference of 64.43 million current US$.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 173rd and Greenland ranks 174th of 207 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 970.41 million current US$ | 2.01 billion current US$ | 1.04 billion current US$ | Greenland |
| 2010s | 2.08 billion current US$ | 2.65 billion current US$ | 568.00 million current US$ | Greenland |
| 2020s | 2.71 billion current US$ | 3.09 billion current US$ | 378.35 million current US$ | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Bhutan or Greenland?
- Bhutan, at 3.26 billion current US$ against 3.19 billion current US$ in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Bhutan and Greenland?
- 64.43 million current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Greenland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Greenland rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Bhutan ranks 173rd and Greenland ranks 174th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.