Angola vs Ecuador: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Angola
- Ecuador
How they compare
Angola currently reports 121.12 billion current US$ against 120.34 billion current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 777.00 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Angola ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 65th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.90 billion current US$ | 41.33 billion current US$ | 10.57 billion current US$ | Angola |
| 2010s | 107.88 billion current US$ | 90.11 billion current US$ | 17.76 billion current US$ | Angola |
| 2020s | 98.85 billion current US$ | 108.37 billion current US$ | 9.52 billion current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Angola or Ecuador?
- Angola, at 121.12 billion current US$ against 120.34 billion current US$ in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Angola and Ecuador?
- 777.00 million current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Ecuador rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Angola ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 65th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.