Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP

Africa Eastern and Southern
0.9278 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0.9908 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
21st
Equatorial Guinea rank
22nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.250.50.751198020022025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.9908 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9278 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0.063 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 21st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 38 groups.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9022 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9956 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0934 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.929 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9934 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0645 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.9268 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9902 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0634 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per unit of gdp, Africa Eastern and Southern or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.9908 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9278 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per unit of gdp between Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea?
0.063 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 21st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 38 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/equatorial-guinea/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 10,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.