Other small states vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Other small states
645,179 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
37.36 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Other small states rank
12th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
9th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Other small states
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199520092023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 37.36 million current US$ per square kilometre against 645,179 current US$ per square kilometre in Other small states, a difference of 36.71 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 57.9 times Other small states's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has been ahead every year.

Other small states ranks 12th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 9th of 38 groups.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Other small states Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 448,205 current US$ per square kilometre 33.69 million current US$ per square kilometre 33.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 523,716 current US$ per square kilometre 35.77 million current US$ per square kilometre 35.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Other small states or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 37.36 million current US$ per square kilometre against 645,179 current US$ per square kilometre in Other small states as of 2021.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Other small states and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
36.71 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Other small states and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
How do Other small states and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Other small states ranks 12th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 9th of 38 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Other small states vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/other-small-states/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/other-small-states/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Other small states vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.