New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

New Zealand
892,621 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
82nd
Thailand rank
79th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre against 892,621 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 119,359 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 82nd and Thailand ranks 79th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 52,245 current US$ per square kilometre 31,127 current US$ per square kilometre 21,118 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 110,528 current US$ per square kilometre 88,489 current US$ per square kilometre 22,039 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 192,812 current US$ per square kilometre 257,089 current US$ per square kilometre 64,278 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 346,409 current US$ per square kilometre 382,329 current US$ per square kilometre 35,920 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 655,194 current US$ per square kilometre 833,624 current US$ per square kilometre 178,430 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 846,796 current US$ per square kilometre 987,995 current US$ per square kilometre 141,200 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, New Zealand or Thailand?
Thailand, at 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre against 892,621 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between New Zealand and Thailand?
119,359 current US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
New Zealand ranks 82nd and Thailand ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/">New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.